Cass R. Sunstein in Special Issue on Evaluating Nudging of the Missouri Law Journal: “It can be paternalistic to force people to choose. Often people do not wish to choose, but both private and public institutions ask or force them to do so, thus overriding their wishes. As a result, people’s autonomy may be badly compromised and their welfare may be greatly reduced. These points have implications for a range of issues in law and policy, suggesting that those who favor active choosing, and insist on it, may well be overriding people’s preferences and values, and thus running afoul of John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle (for better or for worse). People have limited mental bandwidth, and forcing choices can impose a hedonic or cognitive tax. Sometimes that tax is high….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Trust in Federal Government Sinks to New Depths
Posted in October 15, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
In Referees We Trust? How Peer Review Became a Mark of Scientific Legitimacy
Posted in October 14, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Professionalizing deliberation: a Social Network Analysis of UK climate mini-publics
Posted in October 14, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst