Paper by Nahema Marchal: “Concerns over digital interference in elections are widespread. Yet evidence of its impact is still thin and fragmented. How do malicious uses of social media shape, transform, and distort democratic processes? And how should we characterize this impact? Existing research into the effects of social media manipulation has largely focused on measuring its purported impact on opinion swings and voting behavior. Though laudable, this focus might be too reductive. Drawing on normative theories of liberal democracy, in this paper I argue that the threat of digital interference does not lie in its capacity to change people’s views but rather in its power to undermine popular perceptions of electoral integrity, with potentially far-reaching consequences for public trust. Following this assessment, I formulate a preliminary research agenda and highlight previously overlooked relationships that could be explored to better understand how malicious uses of social media might shape such attitudes and to what effect….(More)”.
Conceptualizing the Impact of Digital Interference in Elections: A Framework and Agenda for Future Research
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
democracy
DOJ Deletes Study Showing Domestic Terrorists Are Most Often Right Wing
Posted in September 17, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, democracy
Manipulation: What It Is, Why It’s Bad, What to Do About It
Posted in September 9, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
democracy
Slopaganda: The interaction between propaganda and generative AI
Posted in September 8, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst