Paper by Isabelle Adam and Mihály Fazekas: “Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is often thought of as a uniformly positive tool making governments more transparent, accountable, and less corrupt. However, the evidence on it is mixed and often misunderstood. Hence, this article carries out a systematic stocktaking of ICT tools’ impact on corruption, offering a nuanced and context-dependent assessment. The tools reviewed are digital public services, crowdsourcing platforms, whistleblowing tools, transparency portals, distributed ledger technology, and artificial intelligence. We scrutinise the evidence both on ICTs’ anticorruption effectiveness and misuse for corruption. Drawing on the commonalities across technologies, we find that ICT can support anti-corruption by impacting public scrutiny in numerous ways: enabling reporting on corruption, promoting transparency and accountability, facilitating citizen participation and government-citizen interactions. However, ICT can also provide new corruption opportunities through the dark web, cryptocurrencies, or the misuse of technologies such as centralised databases. The introduction of ICT tools does not automatically translate into anti-corruption outcomes; rather, impact hinges on the matching between ICT tools and the local context, including support for and skills in using technology….(More)”
Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Collection, Expert Networking, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert NetworkingINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert Networking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Pop-up journals for policy research: can temporary titles deliver answers?
Posted in March 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Center for Regulatory Ingenuity
Posted in February 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Behavioral Science, Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral ScienceINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Science
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Dare to Think Differently: How Open-Mindedness Creates Exceptional Decision-Making
Posted in February 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst