Paper by Joshua S. Gans: “This paper examines the regulation of technological innovation direction under uncertainty about potential harms. We develop a model with two competing technological paths and analyze various regulatory interventions. Our findings show that market forces tend to inefficiently concentrate research on leading paths. We demonstrate that ex post regulatory instruments, particularly liability regimes, outperform ex ante restrictions in most scenarios. The optimal regulatory approach depends critically on the magnitude of potential harm relative to technological benefits. Our analysis reveals subtle insurance motives in resource allocation across research paths, challenging common intuitions about diversification. These insights have important implications for regulating emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, suggesting the need for flexible, adaptive regulatory frameworks…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Ethical and inclusive challenges of integrating AI and indigenous knowledge systems
Posted in October 23, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Science
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
It Looked Like a New Species. The Trouble Was, It Didn’t Exist
Posted in October 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Data Spaces between Co‑ordination Challenges, Financial Viability and Public Policy
Posted in October 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst