Paper by Neil D Lawrence and Jessica K Montgomery: “Public dialogues have produced clear demand signals for AI. These dialogues imagine innovations that improve our shared wellbeing and prosperity while developing under democratic control. AI development has largely advanced along another trajectory. We argue that this gap is a structural feature of an innovation system whose incentives are captured by the attention economy. Closing it requires a different driver of the innovation cycle. We propose an attention reinvestment cycle, in which efficiency gains accrue as freed time that can be invested in community innovation, with frontline professionals adapting and sharing tools that meet priority needs. Operating the cycle at scale requires institutional infrastructure—dialogic, absorptive, and distributive capacities—that the existing science-policy system has yet to develop…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Beyond Open or Closed? The Five A’s of Data Access in a Time of AI
Posted in November 5, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Sex, Lies and Statistics: Why We Need Evidence-Based Policy on Sex and Gender
Posted in November 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
How democracy depends on science — and must protect it
Posted in November 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst