Paper by Jason Brennan and Christopher Freiman: “Many democratic theorists want to replace electoral democracy with sortition or lottery-based political systems, in which at most a small number of lottery-selected citizens will be appointed to exercise political power. They claim one virtue of these systems is that they tend to ensure demographic proportionality, while electoral democracy, they claim, has uneven demographic turnout in voting and even more uneven demographic results in elections. Lottocrat propose to disenfranchise nearly all citizens, but claim, no matter, citizens can be assured that someone demographically like them will hold power. This paper argues that there is something morally problematic about treating individual citizens as tokens of their demographic groups, even if, empirically speaking, demographics have great predictive power about how people vote or what political outcomes they prefer…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Ethical and inclusive challenges of integrating AI and indigenous knowledge systems
Posted in October 23, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Science
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
It Looked Like a New Species. The Trouble Was, It Didn’t Exist
Posted in October 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Data Spaces between Co‑ordination Challenges, Financial Viability and Public Policy
Posted in October 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst