Article by Mark Arsenault, Dana Goldstein, Alan Blinder, and Sarah Mervosh: “The worries that artificial intelligence is degrading education have been building for months. Students are using it for everything, including cheating, and a recent report out of M.I.T. said it is triggering “cognitive surrender.”
Many university leaders are embracing A.I. with enthusiasm anyway.
As A.I. leaders warn about the dangers of their own technology, the dissonance between the optimism of university leaders and the fears of many students and professors may increase. Professors and students are often in a bind about what they should do: Use more A.I. to stay relevant, or dial back to preserve learning and thinking?
While some politicians and A.I. leaders are warning about possible doomsday scenarios for humanity as A.I. models advance, many campus leaders are focused on the existential threat the technology poses to universities.
The committee at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology studying A.I. use released a number of alarming findings, including that the technology has caused “major shifts in campus culture,” isolating students who are skipping office hours and ditching communal studying. Getting answers from a bot can create “the illusion of learning” for students who reach for A.I. “at the first hint of struggle,” the M.I.T. committee wrote in its August report.
At the same time, “the potential of these technologies to augment work across campus is immense,” the committee wrote.
The M.I.T. report crystallized some of the thinking in higher education about A.I., but top administrators have been embroiled in debates for several years. Administrators have often been the most eager to champion A.I. efforts, while many faculty and students remain more skeptical…(More)”.
