Paper by Gary King and Steven Worthington: “We show that AI-generated article reviews are now better, by every measure we could construct, than reviews written by well-compensated human experts and judged to be of unusually high quality by journal editors and authors. We then discuss how this result may inform journal policy choices, with concerning downsides as well as potential paths to increase publication speed and quality; reduce adversarial interactions; improve the experience of editors, reviewers, authors, and readers; and advance science…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
A Congressional Commission on AI Risk is Overdue
Posted in October 27, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Large language models for computational social science
Posted in October 27, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
What Should the Rules for A.I. Companies Actually Be? We Asked the Experts.
Posted in October 27, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst