Elizabeth E. Joh at William & Mary Bill of Rights J. (2017 Forthcoming): “Discussions of predictive algorithms used by the police tend to assume the police are merely end users of big data. Accordingly, police departments are consumers and clients of big data — not much different than users of Spotify, Netflix, Amazon, or Facebook. Yet this assumption about big data policing contains a flaw. Police are not simply end users of big data. They generate the information that big data programs rely upon. This essay explains why predictive policing programs can’t be fully understood without an acknowledgment of the role police have in creating its inputs. Their choices, priorities, and even omissions become the inputs algorithms use to forecast crime. The filtered nature of crime data matters because these programs promise cutting edge results, but may deliver analyses with hidden limitations….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Smart City
Smart as a City: The Politics of Test-Bed Urbanism
Posted in May 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
Non-Traditional Data in Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Identifying and Addressing First- and Last-Mile Challenges
Posted in May 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
The Context Loop: How AI Remembers Us, and Shapes Digital Self-Determination
Posted in May 3, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst