Bret Fraussen and Darren Halpin in Public Administration: “The ongoing embrace of interest groups as agents capable of addressing democratic deficits in governing institutions is in large part because they are assumed to contribute democratic legitimacy to policy processes. Nonetheless, they face the challenge of legitimating their policy advocacy in democratic terms, clarifying what makes them legitimate partners in governance. In this article we suggest that digital innovations have disrupted the established mechanisms of legitimation. While the impact of this disruption is most easily demonstrated in the rise of a small number of ‘digital natives’, we argue that the most substantive impact has been on more conventional groups, which typically follow legitimation logics of either representation or solidarity. While several legacy groups are experimenting with new legitimation approaches, the opportunities provided by technology seem to offer more organizational benefits to groups employing the logic of solidarity, and appear less compatible with the more traditional logic of representation….(More)”.
How do interest groups legitimate their policy advocacy? Reconsidering linkage and internal democracy in times of digital disruption
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
artificial intelligence, democracy
AI and Democratic Publics
Posted in August 5, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
democracy
Shrinking Civic Space, Digital Funding, and Legitimacy in a Post-Truth Era
Posted in July 22, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
democracy
Democratic innovation for change: A participatory corrective to deliberative hegemony
Posted in July 21, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst