Paper by Nicholas Fabiano et al: “Systematic reviews are a cornerstone for synthesizing the available evidence on a given topic. They simultaneously allow for gaps in the literature to be identified and provide direction for future research. However, due to the ever-increasing volume and complexity of the available literature, traditional methods for conducting systematic reviews are less efficient and more time-consuming. Numerous artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being released with the potential to optimize efficiency in academic writing and assist with various stages of the systematic review process including developing and refining search strategies, screening titles and abstracts for inclusion or exclusion criteria, extracting essential data from studies and summarizing findings. Therefore, in this article we provide an overview of the currently available tools and how they can be incorporated into the systematic review process to improve efficiency and quality of research synthesis. We emphasize that authors must report all AI tools that have been used at each stage to ensure replicability as part of reporting in methods….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
The Myth of the Informed Citizen
Posted in May 8, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
The Context Loop: How AI Remembers Us, and Shapes Digital Self-Determination
Posted in May 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Civic Technology
Design Thinking
E-Gov
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Signals from the Frontier of Digital Statecraft: Rethinking governance in the age of AI
Posted in May 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst