Paper by Neil D Lawrence and Jessica K Montgomery: “Public dialogues have produced clear demand signals for AI. These dialogues imagine innovations that improve our shared wellbeing and prosperity while developing under democratic control. AI development has largely advanced along another trajectory. We argue that this gap is a structural feature of an innovation system whose incentives are captured by the attention economy. Closing it requires a different driver of the innovation cycle. We propose an attention reinvestment cycle, in which efficiency gains accrue as freed time that can be invested in community innovation, with frontline professionals adapting and sharing tools that meet priority needs. Operating the cycle at scale requires institutional infrastructure—dialogic, absorptive, and distributive capacities—that the existing science-policy system has yet to develop…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
The peer review crisis and the future of scholarly publishing: notes from the editorial frontline
Posted in September 17, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
Who decides what and how data is reused? Lessons learned from youth engagement and co-design for responsible data reuse in services
Posted in September 17, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
NYC Public Advocate Releases Report on AI Governance
Posted in September 16, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst