Paper by Matthew Liao et al: “As AI and digital technologies advance rapidly, governance frameworks struggle to keep pace with emerging applications and risks. This paper introduces a “5W1H” framework to systematically analyze AI governance proposals through six key questions: What should be regulated (data, algorithms, sectors, or risk levels), Why regulate (ethics, legal compliance, market failures, or national interests), Who should regulate (industry, government, or public stakeholders), When regulation should occur (upstream, downstream, or lifecycle approaches), Where it should take place (local, national, or international levels), and How it should be enacted (hard versus soft regulation). The framework is applied to compare the European Union’s AI Act with the current US regulatory landscape, revealing the EU’s comprehensive, risk-based approach versus America’s fragmented, sector-specific strategy. By providing a structured analytical tool, the 5W1H framework helps policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders navigate complex AI governance decisions and identify areas for improvement in existing regulatory approaches…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA, data collaboratives
Using Remotely Sensed Data to Assess War-Induced Damage to Agricultural Cultivation: Evidence from Ukraine
Posted in October 1, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Access for Researchers under the Digital Services Act: From Policy to Practice
Posted in September 30, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Bringing Light to Government Dark Data in the Age of AI
Posted in September 30, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst