Paper by Joshua S. Gans: “This paper examines the regulation of technological innovation direction under uncertainty about potential harms. We develop a model with two competing technological paths and analyze various regulatory interventions. Our findings show that market forces tend to inefficiently concentrate research on leading paths. We demonstrate that ex post regulatory instruments, particularly liability regimes, outperform ex ante restrictions in most scenarios. The optimal regulatory approach depends critically on the magnitude of potential harm relative to technological benefits. Our analysis reveals subtle insurance motives in resource allocation across research paths, challenging common intuitions about diversification. These insights have important implications for regulating emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, suggesting the need for flexible, adaptive regulatory frameworks…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Behavioral Science, Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral ScienceINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Science
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
It’s on You
Posted in March 9, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, Expert Networking, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert NetworkingINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert Networking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Pop-up journals for policy research: can temporary titles deliver answers?
Posted in March 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Center for Regulatory Ingenuity
Posted in February 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst