Tina Nabatchi, Emma Ertinger and Matt Leighninger in Conflict Resolution Quaterly: “In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems….(More)”
The Future of Public Participation: Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
AI and Political Freedom: The Risk to Democracy and How to Respond
Posted in October 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Open Data
Toward a Science of Questions
Posted in October 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Governance in an Anti-System Age
Posted in October 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst