Paper by Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans: “AI predicts; humans use its predictions to make decisions. These predictions are combined with human verification and analysis, queries to other statistical models, and so on. The economic value of an AI, therefore, depends on how it interacts with the surrounding decision environment. We describe the value of AI as part of this “composite experiment” where AI makes a coarse prediction of the state of the world, show what this means for optimal model training via a geometric argument, explain why optimal training can be discontinuous in economic variables, and study how heterogeneous users or monopoly model trainers affect these results. In particular, maximizing the unconditional accuracy of AI predictions is generally suboptimal…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Agentic profiles for effective AI governance
Posted in August 13, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Behavioral Science
Civic Technology
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
The Prediction Revolution
Posted in August 13, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
A citizens’ jury exploring public views on neurotechnology and neurodata
Posted in August 13, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst