Paper by Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans: “AI predicts; humans use its predictions to make decisions. These predictions are combined with human verification and analysis, queries to other statistical models, and so on. The economic value of an AI, therefore, depends on how it interacts with the surrounding decision environment. We describe the value of AI as part of this “composite experiment” where AI makes a coarse prediction of the state of the world, show what this means for optimal model training via a geometric argument, explain why optimal training can be discontinuous in economic variables, and study how heterogeneous users or monopoly model trainers affect these results. In particular, maximizing the unconditional accuracy of AI predictions is generally suboptimal…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Beyond Open or Closed? The Five A’s of Data Access in a Time of AI
Posted in November 5, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Sex, Lies and Statistics: Why We Need Evidence-Based Policy on Sex and Gender
Posted in November 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
How democracy depends on science — and must protect it
Posted in November 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst