Article by David Zendle & Heather Wardle: “Industry data sharing has the potential to revolutionise evidence on video gaming and mental health, as well as a host of other critical topics. However, collaborative data sharing agreements between academics and industry partners may also afford industry enormous power in steering the development of this evidence base. In this paper, we outline how nonfinancial conflicts of interest may emerge when industry share data with academics. We then go on to describe ways in which such conflicts may affect the quality of the evidence base. Finally, we suggest strategies for mitigating this impact and preserving research independence. We focus on the development of data infrastructure: technological, social, and educational architecture that facilitates unfettered and free access to the kinds of high-quality data that industry hold, but without industry involvement…(More)”.
We need data infrastructure as well as data sharing – conflicts of interest in video game research
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA, data collaboratives
Digital epidemiology: leveraging social media for insight into epilepsy and mental health
Posted in December 9, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA, data collaboratives
Use of mobile phone data to measure behavioral response to SMS evacuation alerts
Posted in December 2, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA, data collaboratives
Understanding data collaboratives ten years after their definition: Distinctive features, impacts and research priorities
Posted in November 13, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst