Article by David Zendle & Heather Wardle: “Industry data sharing has the potential to revolutionise evidence on video gaming and mental health, as well as a host of other critical topics. However, collaborative data sharing agreements between academics and industry partners may also afford industry enormous power in steering the development of this evidence base. In this paper, we outline how nonfinancial conflicts of interest may emerge when industry share data with academics. We then go on to describe ways in which such conflicts may affect the quality of the evidence base. Finally, we suggest strategies for mitigating this impact and preserving research independence. We focus on the development of data infrastructure: technological, social, and educational architecture that facilitates unfettered and free access to the kinds of high-quality data that industry hold, but without industry involvement…(More)”.
We need data infrastructure as well as data sharing – conflicts of interest in video game research
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Design Thinking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Open Innovation
Better Questions, Better Insights
Posted in May 8, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Open Data
Bad government statistics can cost the economy billions
Posted in May 8, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
“Where Do I Start?”: How Governments Can Prioritise AI Solutions for Health
Posted in May 8, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst