Article by Joseph Foti: “In the prior OGP Horizons piece in this series, we looked at what governments actually mean when they talk about tech sovereignty. In the abstract, this is an ability to control technology in their borders and to be relatively autonomous when it comes to using foreign technology.
But, in practice, governments are quite diverse. As a recap, we looked at the legislation and policies being adopted by many “middle powers,” as well as the EU, the US, and China. (Readers are encouraged to skim the summary of all of the findings here.) The findings showed that interventions fell into three categories.
- Cost: Buying software and computing power and spending money to build domestic capacity.
- Exit: Preserving the ability to leave a bad relationship.
- Leverage: Controlling holdings that other jurisdictions need.
Within each of these categories, there are a number of different policies. In Part II of the series, we will go through cost, exit, and leverage. We’ll also look at why and where open government can help ensure that people are getting what they need from the policies, namely autonomy, good value, security, and jobs.
For each of the given policy areas, there is a distinct role for transparency and public oversight. In some cases, especially to those related to land and permitting as well as standards development, there is a particular role for public participation…(More)”.
