New paper by Victor Naroditskiy, Nicholas R. Jennings, Pascal Van Hentenryck, Manuel Cebrian: “Crowdsourcing offers unprecedented potential for solving tasks efficiently by tapping into the skills of large groups of people. A salient feature of crowdsourcing—its openness of entry—makes it vulnerable to malicious behavior. Such behavior took place in a number of recent popular crowdsourcing competitions. We provide game-theoretic analysis of a fundamental tradeoff between the potential for increased productivity and the possibility of being set back by malicious behavior. Our results show that in crowdsourcing competitions malicious behavior is the norm, not the anomaly—a result contrary to the conventional wisdom in the area. Counterintuitively, making the attacks more costly does not deter them but leads to a less desirable outcome. These findings have cautionary implications for the design of crowdsourcing competitions…(More)”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Design Thinking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Advanced Introduction to Public Sector Innovation
Posted in May 30, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
Big Data
DATA
Technology, Peace, and Human Dignity: Reflections on the Relevance of Magnifica Humanitas for PeaceTech
Posted in May 28, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Behavioral Science
Design Thinking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Stop Building Innovation Labs
Posted in May 28, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst