Thomas De Haan and Jona Linde in The Economic Journal: “Because people disproportionally follow defaults, both libertarian paternalists and marketers try to present options they want to promote as the default. However, setting certain defaults and thereby influencing current decisions, may also affect choices in later, similar decisions. In this paper we explore experimentally whether the default bias can be reinforced by providing good defaults. We show that people who faced better defaults in the past are more likely to follow defaults than people who faced random defaults, hurting their later performance. This malleability of the default bias explains certain marketing practices and serves as an insight for libertarian paternalists….(More)”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Behavioral Science, Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral ScienceINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Science
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
It’s on You
Posted in March 9, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Behavioral Science, Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral ScienceINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Science
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Dare to Think Differently: How Open-Mindedness Creates Exceptional Decision-Making
Posted in February 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Behavioral Science, Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral ScienceINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Science
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Strikingly Similar
Posted in January 27, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst