“In this short essay, written for a symposium in the San Diego Law Review, Professor Daniel Solove examines the nothing to hide argument. When asked about government surveillance and data mining, many people respond by declaring: “I’ve got nothing to hide.” According to the nothing to hide argument, there is no threat to privacy unless the government uncovers unlawful activity, in which case a person has no legitimate justification to claim that it remain private. The nothing to hide argument and its variants are quite prevalent, and thus are worth addressing. In this essay, Solove critiques the nothing to hide argument and exposes its faulty underpinnings….(More)”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
artificial intelligence, DATA, privacy
Co-creating Consent for Data Use — AI-Powered Ethics for Biomedical AI
Posted in September 10, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
privacy
Impacted Stakeholder Participation in AI and Data Governance
Posted in September 3, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA, privacy
Why de-identified data sharing for research should be in the public interest
Posted in August 10, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst