This article examines the citizen representativeness of crowdsourcing achieved through 311 systems—the non-emergency and quality of life service request reporting systems used by local governments. Based on surveys of San Francisco residents conducted in 2011, 2013, and 2015, our findings suggest that no systematic biases exist in participation rates across a range of socio-economic indicators. In addition, the findings provide evidence that participation may be responding positively to the city’s responsiveness, thus creating a self-reinforcing process that benefits an increasingly diverse and representative body of users. This inquiry builds on earlier studies of Boston and San Francisco that show that 311 systems did not bias response to traditionally disadvantaged groups (lower socioeconomic status or racial/ethnic minorities) at the demand level nor from high-volume users….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Design Thinking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Advanced Introduction to Public Sector Innovation
Posted in May 30, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
Big Data
DATA
Technology, Peace, and Human Dignity: Reflections on the Relevance of Magnifica Humanitas for PeaceTech
Posted in May 28, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Behavioral Science
Design Thinking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Stop Building Innovation Labs
Posted in May 28, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst