Paper by the The LSE GV314 Group: “In the United Kingdom, the influence of parliamentary select committees on policy depends substantially on the ‘seriousness’ with which they approach the task of gathering and evaluating a wide range of evidence and producing reports and recommendations based on it. However, select committees are often charged with being concerned with ‘political theatre’ and ‘grandstanding’ rather than producing evidence-based policy recommendations. This study, based on a survey of 919 ‘discretionary’ witnesses, including those submitting written and oral evidence, examines the case for arguing that there is political bias and grandstanding in the way select committees go about selecting witnesses, interrogating them and using their evidence to put reports together. While the research finds some evidence of such ‘grandstanding’ it does not appear to be strong enough to suggest that the role of select committees is compromised as a crowdsourcer of evidence….(More)”.
UK parliamentary select committees: crowdsourcing for evidence-based policy or grandstanding?
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Towards Effective E-Participation of Citizens in the European Union: The Development of AskThePublic
Posted in October 6, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, collective intelligence, PEOPLE
Know Your City
Posted in October 1, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen science, crowdsourcing
Bali Under Water: Communities Map Floods in Real Time to Guide Evacuations
Posted in September 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst