New NBER working paper by George J. Borjas and Kirk B. Doran: “Knowledge generation is key to economic growth, and scientific prizes are designed to encourage it. But how does winning a prestigious prize affect future output? We compare the productivity of Fields medalists (winners of the top mathematics prize) to that of similarly brilliant contenders. The two groups have similar publication rates until the award year, after which the winners’ productivity declines. The medalists begin to “play the field,” studying unfamiliar topics at the expense of writing papers. It appears that tournaments can have large post-prize effects on the effort allocation of knowledge producers.”
Prizes and Productivity: How Winning the Fields Medal Affects Scientific Output
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
behavioral science
AI-enhanced nudging in public policy: why to worry and how to respond
Posted in June 23, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, democracy
The Hypocrisy Trap: How Changing What We Criticize Can Improve Our Lives
Posted in June 17, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science
Using Gamification to Engage Citizens in Micro-Mobility Data Sharing
Posted in May 26, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst