Paper by Lisa van Dijk and Jonas Lefevere: “Academics and practitioners are increasingly interested in deliberative minipublics and whether these can address widespread dissatisfaction with contemporary politics. While optimism seems to prevail, there is also talk that the use of minipublics may backfire. When the government disregards a minipublic’s recommendations, this could lead to more dissatisfaction than not asking for its advice in the first place. Using an online survey experiment in Belgium (n = 3,102), we find that, compared to a representative decision-making process, a minipublic tends to bring about higher political support when its recommendations are fully adopted by the government, whereas it generates lower political support when its recommendations are not adopted. This study presents novel insights into whether and when the use of minipublics may alleviate or aggravate political dissatisfaction among the public at large….(More)”
Can the use of minipublics backfire? Examining how policy adoption shapes the effect of minipublics on political support among the general public
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
citizen science, PEOPLE
A vision for responsible AI integration in citizen science
Posted in February 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
PEOPLE
Theorizing the functions and patterns of agency in the policymaking process
Posted in February 2, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
PEOPLE
Of the people, by the algorithm: how AI transforms the role of democratic representatives?
Posted in January 29, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst