Article by Manon Revel and Théophile Pénigaud: “This article unpacks the design choices behind longstanding and newly proposed computational frameworks aimed at finding common grounds across collective preferences and examines their potential future impacts, both technically and normatively. It begins by situating AI-assisted preference elicitation within the historical role of opinion polls, emphasizing that preferences are shaped by the decision-making context and are seldom objectively captured. With that caveat in mind, we explore AI-facilitated collective judgment as a discovery tool for fostering reasonable representations of a collective will, sense-making, and agreement-seeking. At the same time, we caution against dangerously misguided uses, such as enabling binding decisions, fostering gradual disempowerment or post-rationalizing political outcomes…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
collective intelligence, PEOPLE
Everyone, everywhere, all at once LLMs and the new physics of collective intelligence
Posted in August 30, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Leveraging LLMs for Privacy-Aware Predictions in Participatory Budgeting
Posted in August 12, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Alternates, Assemble! Selecting Optimal Alternates for Citizens’ Assemblies
Posted in August 11, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst