Paper by David Karpf: “Many e-government initiatives start with promise, but end up either as digital “ghost towns” or as a venue exploited by organized interests. The problem with these initiatives is rooted in a set of common misunderstandings about the structure of citizen interest in public participation – simply put, the Internet does not create public interest, it $2 public interest. Public interest can be high or low, and governmental initiatives can be polarized or non-polarized. The paper discusses two common pitfalls (“the Field of Dreams Fallacy” and “Blessed are the Organized”) that demand alternate design choices and modified expectations. By treating public interest and public polarization as variables, the paper develops a typology of appropriate e-government initiatives that can help identify the boundary conditions for transformative digital engagement.”
E-Government and Its Limitations: Assessing the True Demand Curve for Citizen Public Participation
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Data Collaboratives
What’s in it for me? a systematic literature review on incentive mechanisms fostering users’ data sharing behavior in data ecosystems
Posted in August 23, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Open Data
Cancer Risk Is Still There, Even If the Data Isn’t
Posted in August 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
What it takes to use AI for social good: evidence from European social good projects and implications for higher education
Posted in August 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst