Paper by Lauren Henry Scholz: “Generalist confusion about the technology behind complex algorithms has led to inconsistent case law for algorithmic contracts. Case law explicitly grounded in the principle that algorithms are constructive agents for the companies they serve would provide a clear basis for enforceability of algorithmic contracts that is both principled from a technological perspective and is readily intelligible and able to be applied by generalists….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence, Collection, DATA
Artificial IntelligenceDATA
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
A Large-Language-Model Framework for Automated Humanitarian Situation Reporting
Posted in March 11, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence, Collection, DATA
Artificial IntelligenceDATA
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
AI agents are coming for government. How one big city is letting them in
Posted in March 10, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence, Collection, DATA
Artificial IntelligenceDATA
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
The train has left the station: Agentic AI and the future of social science research
Posted in March 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst