Paper by David Karpf: “Many e-government initiatives start with promise, but end up either as digital “ghost towns” or as a venue exploited by organized interests. The problem with these initiatives is rooted in a set of common misunderstandings about the structure of citizen interest in public participation – simply put, the Internet does not create public interest, it $2 public interest. Public interest can be high or low, and governmental initiatives can be polarized or non-polarized. The paper discusses two common pitfalls (“the Field of Dreams Fallacy” and “Blessed are the Organized”) that demand alternate design choices and modified expectations. By treating public interest and public polarization as variables, the paper develops a typology of appropriate e-government initiatives that can help identify the boundary conditions for transformative digital engagement.”
E-Government and Its Limitations: Assessing the True Demand Curve for Citizen Public Participation
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
democracy
Shrinking Civic Space, Digital Funding, and Legitimacy in a Post-Truth Era
Posted in July 22, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
democracy
Democratic innovation for change: A participatory corrective to deliberative hegemony
Posted in July 21, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
design thinking
Can Design Transform Governance?
Posted in July 21, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst