Thomas De Haan and Jona Linde in The Economic Journal: “Because people disproportionally follow defaults, both libertarian paternalists and marketers try to present options they want to promote as the default. However, setting certain defaults and thereby influencing current decisions, may also affect choices in later, similar decisions. In this paper we explore experimentally whether the default bias can be reinforced by providing good defaults. We show that people who faced better defaults in the past are more likely to follow defaults than people who faced random defaults, hurting their later performance. This malleability of the default bias explains certain marketing practices and serves as an insight for libertarian paternalists….(More)”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
behavioral science, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
The Power of Asking ‘How?’
Posted in September 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, democracy
Manipulation: What It Is, Why It’s Bad, What to Do About It
Posted in September 9, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science
The Cambridge Handbook of Behavioural Data Science
Posted in August 4, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst