Paper by David Pérez Castrillo and David Wettstein: “We study innovation contests with asymmetric information and identical contestants, where contestants’ efforts and innate abilities generate inventions of varying qualities. The designer offers a reward to the contestant achieving the highest quality and receives the revenue generated by the innovation. We characterize the equilibrium behavior, outcomes and payoffs for both nondiscriminatory and discriminatory (where the reward is contestant-dependent) contests. We derive conditions under which the designer obtains a larger payoff when using a discriminatory contest and describe settings where these conditions are satisfied.”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
How to Build Trustworthy Digital Health Initiatives?
Posted in October 23, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Impact Licensing as a strategic instrument for Impact Investment
Posted in October 23, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Emergent standards: Enabling collaborations across institutions
Posted in October 23, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst