Paper by David Pérez Castrillo and David Wettstein: “We study innovation contests with asymmetric information and identical contestants, where contestants’ efforts and innate abilities generate inventions of varying qualities. The designer offers a reward to the contestant achieving the highest quality and receives the revenue generated by the innovation. We characterize the equilibrium behavior, outcomes and payoffs for both nondiscriminatory and discriminatory (where the reward is contestant-dependent) contests. We derive conditions under which the designer obtains a larger payoff when using a discriminatory contest and describe settings where these conditions are satisfied.”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Collection, Expert Networking, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert NetworkingINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert Networking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Pop-up journals for policy research: can temporary titles deliver answers?
Posted in March 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Center for Regulatory Ingenuity
Posted in February 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Behavioral Science, Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral ScienceINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Science
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Dare to Think Differently: How Open-Mindedness Creates Exceptional Decision-Making
Posted in February 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst