Paper by David Pérez Castrillo and David Wettstein: “We study innovation contests with asymmetric information and identical contestants, where contestants’ efforts and innate abilities generate inventions of varying qualities. The designer offers a reward to the contestant achieving the highest quality and receives the revenue generated by the innovation. We characterize the equilibrium behavior, outcomes and payoffs for both nondiscriminatory and discriminatory (where the reward is contestant-dependent) contests. We derive conditions under which the designer obtains a larger payoff when using a discriminatory contest and describe settings where these conditions are satisfied.”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Opening Multilateralism: Two Pathways to Digital Legitimacy
Posted in September 16, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Should the public sector build its own AI?
Posted in September 11, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, democracy
Manipulation: What It Is, Why It’s Bad, What to Do About It
Posted in September 9, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst