Paper by Sophie Devillers, Julien Vrydagh, Didier Caluwaerts & Min Reuchamps: “Random sampling offers an equal chance to all citizens to be randomly invited to a deliberative mini-public. However, a large number of randomly invited citizens usually refuses to participate, which is why larger sample has to be drawn to obtain enough positive responses to compose the mini-public. Then, a second random sampling is operated among the people who accepted to participate, usually along quotas reflecting the population at large. This paper seeks to investigate those people who were randomly invited but finally not selected to participate the citizen panel “Make your Brussels Mobility”. On the first stage, 8000 residents of Brussels were randomly invited. Among them, 377 accepted to participate. On the second stage, 40 citizens were randomly selected to compose the panel. Our paper builds on a survey sent to the 336 citizens who were finally not selected to participate and studies their perceptions of the legitimacy of the citizen panel….(More)”.
Invited But Not Selected: The Perceptions of a Mini-Public by Randomly Invited – but not Selected – Citizens
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Greater use of evidence and public input in policymaking could strengthen trust in Latin American and Caribbean public institutions
Posted in November 25, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
PEOPLE
The Gig Public
Posted in November 24, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Democracy Is in Trouble. This Region Is Turning to Its People.
Posted in November 23, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst