Paper by Sophie Devillers, Julien Vrydagh, Didier Caluwaerts & Min Reuchamps: “Random sampling offers an equal chance to all citizens to be randomly invited to a deliberative mini-public. However, a large number of randomly invited citizens usually refuses to participate, which is why larger sample has to be drawn to obtain enough positive responses to compose the mini-public. Then, a second random sampling is operated among the people who accepted to participate, usually along quotas reflecting the population at large. This paper seeks to investigate those people who were randomly invited but finally not selected to participate the citizen panel “Make your Brussels Mobility”. On the first stage, 8000 residents of Brussels were randomly invited. Among them, 377 accepted to participate. On the second stage, 40 citizens were randomly selected to compose the panel. Our paper builds on a survey sent to the 336 citizens who were finally not selected to participate and studies their perceptions of the legitimacy of the citizen panel….(More)”.
Invited But Not Selected: The Perceptions of a Mini-Public by Randomly Invited – but not Selected – Citizens
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
PEOPLE
Of the people, by the algorithm: how AI transforms the role of democratic representatives?
Posted in January 29, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
The Best Weapon You Have in the Fight Against ICE
Posted in January 27, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Citizen engagement paves the way for innovative mobility deployment across Europe
Posted in January 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst