Paper by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua S. Gans, and Avi Goldfarb: “Recent advances in AI represent improvements in prediction. We examine how decisionmaking and risk management strategies change when prediction improves. The adoption of AI may cause substitution away from risk management activities used when rules are applied (rules require always taking the same action), instead allowing for decisionmaking (choosing actions based on the predicted state). We provide a formal model evaluating the impact of AI and how risk management, stakes, and interrelated tasks affect AI adoption. The broad conclusion is that AI adoption can be stymied by existing processes designed to address uncertainty. In particular, many processes are designed to enable coordinated decisionmaking among different actors in an organization. AI can make coordination even more challenging. However, when the cost of changing such processes falls, then the returns from AI adoption increase….(More)”.
Prediction machines, insurance, and protection: An alternative perspective on AI’s role in production
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
artificial intelligence, DATA
FanFAIR: sensitive data sets semi-automatic fairness assessment
Posted in September 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence
Improving How State and Local Governments Use AI
Posted in September 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence, DATA
We Tested AI Impact Assessments. Here’s What We Learned.
Posted in September 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst