New NBER working paper by George J. Borjas and Kirk B. Doran: “Knowledge generation is key to economic growth, and scientific prizes are designed to encourage it. But how does winning a prestigious prize affect future output? We compare the productivity of Fields medalists (winners of the top mathematics prize) to that of similarly brilliant contenders. The two groups have similar publication rates until the award year, after which the winners’ productivity declines. The medalists begin to “play the field,” studying unfamiliar topics at the expense of writing papers. It appears that tournaments can have large post-prize effects on the effort allocation of knowledge producers.”
Prizes and Productivity: How Winning the Fields Medal Affects Scientific Output
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
behavioral science, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Strikingly Similar
Posted in January 27, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Economics of AI: LLM Biases and Corrections
Posted in January 26, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Nudging at Scale: Evidence from a Government Text Messaging Campaign during School Shutdowns in Punjab, Pakistan
Posted in January 11, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst