Paper by Isabelle Freiling et al: “A growing chorus of academicians, public health officials, and other science communicators have warned of what they see as an ill-informed public making poor personal or electoral decisions. Misinformation is often seen as an urgent new problem, so some members of these communities have pushed for quick but untested solutions without carefully diagnosing ethical pitfalls of rushed interventions. This article argues that attempts to “cure” public opinion that are inconsistent with best available social science evidence not only leave the scientific community vulnerable to long-term reputational damage but also raise significant ethical questions. It also suggests strategies for communicating science and health information equitably, effectively, and ethically to audiences affected by it without undermining affected audiences’ agency over what to do with it…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
democracy, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Strengthening Public Interest Media in the Age of GenAI
Posted in November 20, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
For scientists, the right questions are often the hardest
Posted in November 19, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Adaptive governance: new technological infrastructures to address complex societal challenges
Posted in November 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst