Paper by Isabelle Freiling et al: “A growing chorus of academicians, public health officials, and other science communicators have warned of what they see as an ill-informed public making poor personal or electoral decisions. Misinformation is often seen as an urgent new problem, so some members of these communities have pushed for quick but untested solutions without carefully diagnosing ethical pitfalls of rushed interventions. This article argues that attempts to “cure” public opinion that are inconsistent with best available social science evidence not only leave the scientific community vulnerable to long-term reputational damage but also raise significant ethical questions. It also suggests strategies for communicating science and health information equitably, effectively, and ethically to audiences affected by it without undermining affected audiences’ agency over what to do with it…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Civic Technology
Democracy
Design Thinking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Incubators and accelerators for public sector innovation
Posted in August 26, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Democracy in Practice: A Report on Innovations in Participatory Governance
Posted in August 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Rebuilding Democracy: Why Large-Scale Reform Requires a New Institutional Model
Posted in August 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst