Paper by Joshua Schwartzstein & Adi Sunderam: “To understand new information, we exchange models or interpretations with others. This paper provides a framework for thinking about such social exchanges of models. The key assumption is that people adopt the interpretation in their network that best explains the data, given their prior beliefs. An implication is that interpretations evolve within a network. For many network structures, social learning mutes reactions to data: the exchange of models leaves beliefs closer to priors than they were before. Our results shed light on why disagreements persist as new information arrives, as well as the goal and structure of meetings in organizations…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
behavioral science, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
The Power of Asking ‘How?’
Posted in September 17, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, democracy
Manipulation: What It Is, Why It’s Bad, What to Do About It
Posted in September 9, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science
The Cambridge Handbook of Behavioural Data Science
Posted in August 4, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst