Tina Nabatchi, Emma Ertinger and Matt Leighninger in Conflict Resolution Quaterly: “In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems….(More)”
The Future of Public Participation: Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Behavioral Science, Collection, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral ScienceINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Behavioral Science
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
It’s on You
Posted in March 9, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, Expert Networking, INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert NetworkingINSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Expert Networking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Pop-up journals for policy research: can temporary titles deliver answers?
Posted in March 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, Collective Intelligence, PEOPLE
Collective IntelligencePEOPLE
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
The World Bank Doesn’t Need to Generate More Knowledge. It Needs to Want It.
Posted in March 3, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst