Tina Nabatchi, Emma Ertinger and Matt Leighninger in Conflict Resolution Quaterly: “In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems….(More)”
The Future of Public Participation: Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Opening Multilateralism: Two Pathways to Digital Legitimacy
Posted in September 16, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Should the public sector build its own AI?
Posted in September 11, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
behavioral science, democracy
Manipulation: What It Is, Why It’s Bad, What to Do About It
Posted in September 9, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst