Paper by John R Hibbing et al: “Relative to the well-developed theory and extensive survey batteries on people’s preferences for substantive policy solutions, scholarly understanding of people’s preferences for the mechanisms by which policies should be adopted is disappointing. Theory rarely goes beyond the assumption that people would prefer to rule themselves rather than leave decisions up to elites and measurement rests largely on four items that are not up to the task. In this article, we seek to provide a firmer footing for “process” research by 1) offering an alternative theory holding that people actually want elites to continue to make important political decisions but want them to do so only after acquiring a deep appreciation for the real-world problems facing regular people, and 2) developing and testing a battery of over 50 survey items, appropriate for cross-national research, that extend understanding of how the people want political decisions to be made…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Collection, Collective Intelligence, PEOPLE
Collective IntelligencePEOPLE
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
The World Bank Doesn’t Need to Generate More Knowledge. It Needs to Want It.
Posted in March 3, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, PEOPLE
PEOPLE
PEOPLE
How Polymarket and Kalshi are gamifying truth.
Posted in February 23, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, PEOPLE
PEOPLE
PEOPLE
“We are beautiful.” Creating political and societal traction through multi-stakeholder participation.
Posted in February 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst