Paper by Lauren Henry Scholz: “Generalist confusion about the technology behind complex algorithms has led to inconsistent case law for algorithmic contracts. Case law explicitly grounded in the principle that algorithms are constructive agents for the companies they serve would provide a clear basis for enforceability of algorithmic contracts that is both principled from a technological perspective and is readily intelligible and able to be applied by generalists….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
artificial intelligence, DATA, privacy
Co-creating Consent for Data Use — AI-Powered Ethics for Biomedical AI
Posted in September 10, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence
AI openness
Posted in September 9, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence
Political Automation: An Introduction to AI in Government and Its Impact on Citizens
Posted in September 8, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst