Paper by Chris Culnane, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, and David Watts: “Adopted by government agencies in Australia, New Zealand, and the UK as policy instrument or as embodied into legislation, the ‘Five Safes’ framework aims to manage risks of releasing data derived from personal information. Despite its popularity, the Five Safes has undergone little legal or technical critical analysis. We argue that the Fives Safes is fundamentally flawed: from being disconnected from existing legal protections and appropriation of notions of safety without providing any means to prefer strong technical measures, to viewing disclosure risk as static through time and not requiring repeat assessment. The Five Safes provides little confidence that resulting data sharing is performed using ‘safety’ best practice or for purposes in service of public interest….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
Framework for the Governance of Indigenous Data: HASS and Indigenous Research Data Commons
Posted in June 5, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Open Innovation
Why the Gates Foundation Abandoned Article Processing Charges (and What They’re Doing Instead)
Posted in June 5, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
From COVID-19 to Hantavirus and Ebola: Why Access to Non-Traditional Data Remains a Critical Gap in Outbreak Preparedness
Posted in June 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst