Paper by Mark Coeckelbergh: “There is a broad consensus that artificial intelligence should contribute to the common good, but it is not clear what is meant by that. This paper discusses this issue and uses it as a lens for analysing what it calls the “democracy deficit” in current AI governance, which includes a tendency to deny the inherently political character of the issue and to take a technocratic shortcut. It indicates what we may agree on and what is and should be up to (further) deliberation when it comes to AI ethics and AI governance. Inspired by the republican tradition in political theory, it also argues for a more active role of citizens and (end-)users: not only as participants in deliberation but also in ensuring, creatively and communicatively, that AI contributes to the common good…(More)”.
Artificial intelligence, the common good, and the democratic deficit in AI governance
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
artificial intelligence, DATA
Responsible AI for Official Statistics Framework
Posted in October 29, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence
SMS Charges May Be Inhibiting the Use of AI for 1 Billion People
Posted in October 28, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence
AI literacy in an unequal world: pitfalls and promises
Posted in October 28, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst