Cass R. Sunstein in Special Issue on Evaluating Nudging of the Missouri Law Journal: “It can be paternalistic to force people to choose. Often people do not wish to choose, but both private and public institutions ask or force them to do so, thus overriding their wishes. As a result, people’s autonomy may be badly compromised and their welfare may be greatly reduced. These points have implications for a range of issues in law and policy, suggesting that those who favor active choosing, and insist on it, may well be overriding people’s preferences and values, and thus running afoul of John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle (for better or for worse). People have limited mental bandwidth, and forcing choices can impose a hedonic or cognitive tax. Sometimes that tax is high….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Privacy
Pokémon Go data trained AI that could assist military drones in war zones
Posted in June 13, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Civic Technology
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
The Triad of Tech Sovereignty: Dependency, Openness, and Agency
Posted in June 11, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Linux Foundation Announces OpenSharing Project to Standardize AI Asset and Data Exchange
Posted in June 10, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst