Mapping by Kate Gasporro: “…The field of civic technology is relatively new. There are limited strategies to measure
By mapping the landscape of civic technology, we can see more clearly how eParticipation is being used to address public service challenges, including infrastructure delivery. Although many scholars and practitioners have created independent categories for eParticipation, these categorization frameworks follow a similar pattern. At one end of the spectrum, eParticipation efforts provide public service information and relevant updates to citizens or allowing citizens to contact their officials in a unidirectional flow of information. At the other end, eParticipation efforts allow for deliberate democracy where citizens share decision-making with local government officials. Of the dozen categorization frameworks we found, we selected the most comprehensive one accepted by practitioners. This framework draws from public participation practices and identifies five categories:
eInforming : One-way communication providing online information to citizens (in the form of a website) or togovernment (via ePetitions)eConsulting : Limited two-way communication where citizens can voice their opinions and provide feedbackeInvolving : Two-way communication where citizens go through an online process to capture public concernseCollaborating : Enhanced two-way communication that allows citizens to develop alternative solutions and identify the preferred solution, but decision making remains the government’s responsibilityeEmpowerment : Advanced two-way communication that allows citizens to influence and make decisions as co-producers of policies…
After surveying the civic technology space, we found 24 tools that use eParticipation for infrastructure delivery. We map these technologies according to their intended use phase in infrastructure delivery and type of

The field of civic technology is relatively new. There are limited strategies to measure