Lina Eklund, Isabell Stamm, Wanda Katja Liebermann at First Monday:
“Crowdsourcing, as a digital process employed to obtain information, ideas, and solicit contributions of work, creativity, etc., from large online crowds stems from business, yet is increasingly used in research. Engaging with previous literature and a symposium on academic crowdsourcing this study explores the underlying assumptions about crowdsourcing as a potential academic research method and how these affect the knowledge produced. Results identify crowdsourcing research as research about and with the crowd, explore how tasks can be productive, reconfiguring, and evaluating, and how these are linked to intrinsic and extrinsic rewards, we also identify three types of platforms: commercial platforms, research-specific platforms, and project specific platforms. Finally, the study suggests that crowdsourcing is a digital method that could be considered a pragmatic method; the challenge of a sound crowdsourcing project is to think about the researcher’s relationship to the crowd, the tasks, and the platform used….(More)”.
The crowd in crowdsourcing: Crowdsourcing as a pragmatic research method
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Collection, PEOPLE
The case against efficiency: friction in social media
Posted in February 20, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement, Collection, PEOPLE
Politics Without Politicians: The Case for Citizen Rule
Posted in February 15, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collection, PEOPLE
Gatekeepers or Guardians? How Governance Upholds Deliberative Integrity in Mini-Publics
Posted in February 8, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst