Paper by James Pow: “There are two important dimensions to the membership of mini-publics that are distinct from the membership of conventional representative institutions: the selection mechanism (sortition) and the profile of the body’s eligible membership (‘ordinary’ citizens). This article examines the effects of these design features on perceived legitimacy. A survey experiment in the deeply divided context of Northern Ireland finds no evidence that variation in mini-public selection features has an overall effect on perceived legitimacy, but there are important individual-level differences….(More)”.
Mini-Publics and the Wider Public: The Perceived Legitimacy of Randomly Selecting Citizen Representatives
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
collective intelligence, PEOPLE
AI is changing the physics of collective intelligence—how do we respond?
Posted in December 21, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
PEOPLE
Public trust in regional policymaking and citizen demands for engagement
Posted in December 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Innovating Together – A Guide to Inclusive Regulatory Sandboxing
Posted in December 15, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst