Paper by Joshua S. Gans: “Exploitation of disruptive technologies often requires resource deployment that creates conflict if there are divergent beliefs regarding the efficacy of a new technology. This arises when a visionary agent has more optimistic beliefs about a technological opportunity. Exploration in the form of experiments can be persuasive when beliefs differ by mitigating disagreement and its costs. This paper examines experimental choice when experiments need to persuade as well as inform. It is shown that, due to resource constraints, persuasion factors more highly for entrepreneurial than incumbent firms. However, incumbent firms, despite being able to redeploy resources using authority, are constrained in adoption as exploration cannot mitigate the costs of disagreement…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Trust in Federal Government Sinks to New Depths
Posted in October 15, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
In Referees We Trust? How Peer Review Became a Mark of Scientific Legitimacy
Posted in October 14, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Professionalizing deliberation: a Social Network Analysis of UK climate mini-publics
Posted in October 14, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst