Paper by M Mueller, A Schmidt, B Kuerbis in International Studies Review: “This paper asks whether the Internet’s heavy reliance on nonhierarchical, networked forms of governance is compatible with growing concerns about cyber-security from traditional state actors. Networked governance is defined as a semipermanent, voluntary negotiation system that allows interdependent actors to opt for collaboration or unilateral action in the absence of an overarching authority. Two case studies—Internet routing security and the response to a large-scale botnet known as Conficker—show the prevalence of networked governance on the Internet and provide insight into its strengths and limitations. The paper concludes that both cases raise doubts about the claim that introducing security concerns into Internet governance necessarily leads to more hierarchy and/or a greater role for governments.”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Data Collaboratives
What’s in it for me? a systematic literature review on incentive mechanisms fostering users’ data sharing behavior in data ecosystems
Posted in August 23, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Open Data
Cancer Risk Is Still There, Even If the Data Isn’t
Posted in August 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
What it takes to use AI for social good: evidence from European social good projects and implications for higher education
Posted in August 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst