Paper by M Mueller, A Schmidt, B Kuerbis in International Studies Review: “This paper asks whether the Internet’s heavy reliance on nonhierarchical, networked forms of governance is compatible with growing concerns about cyber-security from traditional state actors. Networked governance is defined as a semipermanent, voluntary negotiation system that allows interdependent actors to opt for collaboration or unilateral action in the absence of an overarching authority. Two case studies—Internet routing security and the response to a large-scale botnet known as Conficker—show the prevalence of networked governance on the Internet and provide insight into its strengths and limitations. The paper concludes that both cases raise doubts about the claim that introducing security concerns into Internet governance necessarily leads to more hierarchy and/or a greater role for governments.”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Meaningful Engagement: Lessons from Canada and Other Democracies
Posted in May 23, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
E-Gov
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
The GovTech Compass: Ten Principles for the Responsible Implementation of GovTech and Digital Public Infrastructure
Posted in May 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Global approaches to infectious disease surveillance and modeling
Posted in May 22, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst