Paper by Peter John and Fredrik M. Sjoberg: “Citizens respond to information about democracy according to whether they are electoral winners or losers. This difference occurs both at the national and constituency level. Democratic interventions that seek to promote accountability and transparency might therefore impact citizens differentially depending on the political party that people support. In a placebo-controlled experimental design, carried out in Kenya, we find that democracy promotion boosts the external efficacy and political participation of ruling party partisans, but leaves those from the opposition unaffected. These responses—based on national incumbency—are further conditioned by the partisanship of the MP of the constituency where the voter resides. These findings throw new light on the impact of civic interventions, such as Get Out the Vote (GOTV) and civic education, common in Africa as well as elsewhere, as we show their benefits accrue to the electoral winners rather than to the losers…(More)”.
Partisan responses to democracy promotion – Estimating the causal effect of a civic information portal
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Guidebook for Deliberative Engagement: Key Features and Practical Insights
Posted in October 27, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Democracy by algorithm? Public attitudes towards AI in parliamentary decision-making in the UK and Japan
Posted in October 27, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Towards Effective E-Participation of Citizens in the European Union: The Development of AskThePublic
Posted in October 6, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst