Donna K. Ginther at the American Behavioral Scientist: “In this article, I describe how data and econometric methods can be used to study the science of broadening participation. I start by showing that theory can be used to structure the approach to using data to investigate gender and race/ethnicity differences in career outcomes. I also illustrate this process by examining whether women of color who apply for National Institutes of Health research funding are confronted with a double bind where race and gender compound their disadvantage relative to Whites. Although high-quality data are needed for understanding the barriers to broadening participation in science careers, it cannot fully explain why women and underrepresented minorities are less likely to be scientists or have less productive science careers. As researchers, it is important to use all forms of data—quantitative, experimental, and qualitative—to deepen our understanding of the barriers to broadening participation….(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Civic Technology
Democracy
Design Thinking
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Incubators and accelerators for public sector innovation
Posted in August 26, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Democracy in Practice: A Report on Innovations in Participatory Governance
Posted in August 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Rebuilding Democracy: Why Large-Scale Reform Requires a New Institutional Model
Posted in August 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst